Active

Remote ID
1
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
PIDA Code
I.02.18.03
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Project Definition
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
ICT
Subsector Name
Fibre Optic Cable
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 1
On SDM
Off
Summary
*** DISCLAIMER: Project information was not obtained. It will be inserted when project information becomes available. ***聽Construction of Ivory Coast section of the fibre optic link between Freetown, Monrovia and Abidjan.
Countries
C么te d'Ivoire, Sierra Leone, Libya, C么te d'Ivoire, Sierra Leone, Libya, C么te d'Ivoire
Beneficiary Countries
Sierra Leone, Libya, C么te d'Ivoire
REC
ECOWAS-CEDEAO
Stakeholders
Economic Community of West African States
Orange
Email
ephremg@nepad.org
Latitude
6.470000
Longitude
-6.167340
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
PIDA Code
T.09.01.01
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Construction
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Transport
Subsector Name
Border Post
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 1
On SDM
Off
Summary
Construction of the Forbes/ Machipanda One-Stop Border Post between Mozambique and Zimbabwe, which lies on the Beira/ Nacala Corridor.
Description

<p>Establishing Forbes/ Machipanda One-Stop Border Post (OSBP). Zimbabwe has prepared improvement plans for both Forbes and Nyamapanda that have been ready since 2005 but have not been implemented. The improvement plans envisage the expansion of the border control area and building of additional facilities and infrastructure. The existing Forbes border post building is currently under renovation and expansion to accommodate commercial office and increasing space in the travellers&#39; clearance hall.</p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
0.00
Countries
Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Zimbabwe
Beneficiary Countries
Mozambique, Zimbabwe
REC
SADC
Stakeholders
Southern African Development Community
Mozambique - Autoridade Tributaria de Mocambique
Zambia Revenue Authority
International Organisation for Migration
Zimbabwe - Ministry of Transport and Infrastructural Development
Email
ephrem.hailu@giz.de
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Updated Date
Latitude
-19.000000
Longitude
32.699800
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Project Definition
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Water
Subsector Name
Multi-purpose Reservoir
Alternative Names
Not available
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 2
On SDM
Off
Summary
<p>- History : - 1920 First mention of regulating the Niger by upstream reservoirs
-</p>
<p>1939 Establishment of the Office du Niger (cotton and rice)
</p>
<p>- 1942 Identification of the potential of the Niandan
</p>
<p>- 1947 Fomi site identified: dam/reservoir (a few km3)
</p>
<p>- 1948-1951 Various studies -&gt; Pre-project study (EDF)
- Agricultural development</p>
<p>- Improvement of navigation on the Niger
</p>
<p>- Power generation production
</p>
<p>- Protection along along the Niger valley against major floods
</p>
<p>- 1983 Feasibility study for the(SNC)
</p>
<p>- 1988 Final feasibility study for the hydroelectric</p>
<p>- 1999 Updating of the feasibility study for the project (SNC)
</p>
<p>- 2007 Grant from the World Bank to PDREGDE/ABN for updating the final technical studies for the Fomi dam;
</p>
<p>- 2010 Environmental ESIA, PRI, PGES,PDL (Coyne et Bellier)
</p>
<p>- 2013 English (en) Select...Feasibility study update</p>
<p>- 2016 Memorandum of Understanding between Yellow River Engineering Consulting CO.,LTD</p>
<p>- 2017 Report of the feasibility study</p>
<p>- 2017Environmental impact and social impact Assessment Scooping - (AECOM)

</p>
<p>- Project context:
The degradation of the ecosystem of the Niger river basin compromise the existence of and deteriorate their living conditions.This is why for this reason, the development of the dam is the best alternative for for sustainable development in the Upper Niger natural resources of the river basin.of the river basin.
In this respect the NBA, in the PADD, has included the development of the Fomi dam as one of the structuring structures at the head of the Niger river basin.Niger river basin.
It is in this context thatthe Government of the Republic of Guinea, requests and calls upon NBA to seek funding for technical studies (APD),environmental studies (updating andof the EIES, PGES, PRI and PDL+PGPPE) the Institutional Study, the cost-benefit and the study on the status of the the status of Joint Works, which the Fomi dam.Fomi dam

Main features</p>
<p>Main characteristics:
</p>
<p>_ Water level (normal reservoir): 396 m
Volume of the reservoir:4978 Mm3
Surface area of the reservoir: 367 km2_x000D</p>
<p>_Maximum height of the dam: 50m_x000D</p>
<p>_ Dam length :_ Length from dam to left bank: 304 m
Length of average concrete dam: 192.12</p>
<p>_ Length of the dam on the right bank: 1028.88 m_</p>
<p>Length of dam crest :1.525 m
Hydraulic turbine</p>
<p>_ Number: 3
Model :ZZ550-L J- 470_x000D</p>
<p>_ Power output: 30.93 MW
</p>
<p>Nominal flow rate (unit) of turbines151.32 m3/s
Annual output 312 GWh</p>
<p>_ Transmission line</p>
<p>transmission line: 30 km
</p>
<p>Total duration of works: 41months_x000D</p>
<p>_ Installed capacity :90MW
AHA development: 3500</p>
<p>_ Fish production: 3500 t/year
River navigation: 8 months/yearx000D_</p>
<p>Low water flow: 103 m3/s</p>
Description

<p>The degradation of the Niger River Basin ecosystem may ultimately compromise the existence of local populations and deteriorate their living conditions. This is why the development of the Fomi dam is the best alternative for sustainable development in the Upper Niger, a guarantee of safeguarding the natural resources of the river basin.</p>
<p>- 1920 First mention of regulating the Niger by upstream reservoirs
</p>
<p>-1939 Establishment of the Office du Niger (cotton and rice)
</p>
<p>- 1942 Identification of the potential of the Niandan
</p>
<p>- 1947 Fomi site identified: dam/reservoir (a few km3)
</p>
<p>- 1948-1951 Various studies -&gt; Pre-project study (EDF)
</p>
<p>- Agricultural development</p>
<p>- Improvement of navigation on the Niger
</p>
<p>- Power generation production
</p>
<p>- Protection along along the Niger valley against major floods
</p>
<p>- 1983 Feasibility study Update</p>
<p> - 1988 Final feasibility study for the hydroelectric</p>
<p>- 1999 Updating of the feasibility study for the project (SNC)
</p>
<p>- 2007 Grant from the World Bank to PDREGDE/ABN for updating the final technical studies for the Fomi dam;
</p>
<p>- 2010 Environmental ESIA, PRI, PGES,PDL (Coyne et Bellier)
</p>
<p>- 2013 Feasibility study update</p>
<p>- 2016 Memorandum of Understanding signed between Yellow River Engineering Consulting CO.,LTD YREC)
</p>
<p>- 2017 Report of the feasibility study</p>
<p>- 2017 Environmental and social impact Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentScooping - (AECOM)

</p>
<p>- Project context:
The degradation of the ecosystem of the Niger river basin compromise the existence of and deteriorate their living conditions. This is why for this reason, the development of the dam is the best alternative for alternative for sustainable development in the Upper Niger natural resources of the river basin.
</p>
<p>In this respect the NBA, in the PADD, has included the development of the Fomi dam as one of the structuring structures at the head of the Niger river basin.Niger river basin.
It is in this context thatthe Government of the Republic of Guinea, requests and calls upon NBAto seek funding for technical studies (APD),environmental studies (updating and of the EIES, PGES, PRI and PDL+PGPPE)PRI and PDL+PGPPE), the Institutional Study institutional study, the cost-benefit and the study on the status of the the status of Joint Works, which the Fomi dam.</p>
<p>Fomi dam _ Main features</p>
<p>Main characteristics:</p>
<p>_ Water level (normal reservoir): 396 m
Volume of the reservoir:4978 Mm3
Surface area of the reservoir: 367 km2
</p>
<p>Maximum height of the dam: 50m
Dam length :_ Length from dam to left bank: 304 m
Length of the average concrete dam: 192.12m
Length of the dam on the right bank: 1028.88 m
</p>
<p>Length of dam crest :1.525 m
Hydraulic turbine:_ Number: 3
Model :ZZ550-L J- 470
Power output output power: 30.93 MW
Nominal flow rate (unit) of turbines</p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
0.00
Project Risk

<p>Not available</p>

Countries
Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria
Beneficiary Countries
Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria
Stakeholders
West Africa Power Pool
Benin - Direction des Routes et Ouvrages d`Ar
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Latitude
10.520000
Longitude
-9.715310
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
PIDA Code
W.02.01
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Construction
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Water
Subsector Name
Multi-purpose Reservoir
Alternative Names
Niger River Basin Management Project
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 1
On SDM
Off
Summary
The construction of a multipurpose dam that will include the expansion of irrigation of agriculture and the supply of 90 to 100 MW of hydropower that would be connected to the West Africa Power Pool (WAPP). The project will preserve the ecosystem of the Niger River Basin, generating electricity, developing irrigated agriculture, fish farming and river transport.
Description

<p>Construction of a dam and hydroelectric plant of 90 MW on the Niandan River in Guinea with a reservoir of about 5 billion m3 of water.</p>

<p>The project has two components, namely:<br />
- Strengthen the institutional and financial capacity of the Niger Basin Authority (NBA) to sustainably fulfill its basic mandate; and<br />
- Facilitate evidence-based decision-making in the process of preparing Fomi&#39;s multipurpose dams and in parallel strengthening of ABN&#39;s capabilities through its direct involvement in this complex project.</p>

<p>The Fomi Dam initiative has been continued in two related projects:<br />
First, an APL-1 project on water resources development and sustainable ecosystem management (WRD SEM) funded by the World Bank (P093806) and secondly, the Niger River Basin Management Project. It is unclear if the APL-1 project is still active through a follow-up phase which might likely be聽named APL-2.<br />
The Niger River Basin Management Project was approved for CIWA funding in November 2014 and aims to strengthen the NBA&#39;s capacity to prepare for Fomi in two phases, namely:<br />
a) facilitate dialogue between stakeholders in Guinea, Mali and the NBA to develop a roadmap on how to proceed with the preparation of the Fomi dam project; and<br />
b) Complementary studies to the main preparatory studies supported by WRD SEM (APL-1).</p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
7.50
Operation Cost
0.00
Project Risk

<ul><li>Displacement of approximately 45,000 people. Encroachment of part of the wetland (Ramzar and Upper Niger National Park).</li><li>An Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and an Involuntary Resettlement Plan (IRP) are recommended to mitigate the negative impacts of the project - Environmental Category B</li></ul>

Countries
Guinea, Guinea, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria
Beneficiary Countries
Guinea
REC
ECOWAS-CEDEAO
Stakeholders
Economic Community of West African States
Guinea Ministry of Environment and Energy
Guinea - Minist猫re de l'脡nergie et de l'Hydraulique
World Bank
Global Water Partnership
Email
ephrem.hailu@giz.de
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Updated Date
Latitude
10.520000
Longitude
-9.715310
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Project Definition
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Water
Alternative Names
Not available
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 2
On SDM
Off
Summary
<p>The drastic fall in the availability of fresh water in the Lake Chad basin has led to a volume of the lake by 95% from1963 to the present day. At the same time the degradation of the Lake Chad ecosystem Chad ecosystem following the droughts of 1973-74 and 1985-86 led to erosion of the watershed and and silting of Lake Chad and its Chad and its main tributaries, the Chari and Logone rivers.The actual rate of silting and sedimentation of Lake Chad is unknown.However, it has been estimated that the lake could receive around 2.8 million tonnes of sediment by rivers each year, and approximately 150 tonnes of wind-generated per km&sup2; of lake per year. Due to silting and sedimentation in the lake, it has become difficult to navigate,especially during low-water periods.Other obstacles to navigation in Lake Chad include invasive plants. The 14th Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the LCBC,held in N'Djamena in April 2012, approved the following measures as a means of improving availability of water in the Chari River and Lake Chad:</p>
<p>i. Improve the hydraulic capacity of the Chari in order to limit losses in flood plains; </p>
<p>ii. Develop Lake Chad and its main tributaries through dredging and desilting to ensure a better distribution of water in the</p>
<p>the various basins of the lake.</p>
<p>There is therefore a need for the intervention strategy should begin by acquiring knowledge,as well as the need for observation and short-term measurements.</p>
Description

<p>The drastic decline in freshwater availability in the Lake Chad Basin has resulted in a 95% decrease in the volume of the lake from 1963 to date. At the same time, the degradation of the Lake Chad ecosystem following the droughts of 1973-74 and 1985-86 leads to increased erosion of the watershed and silting of Lake Chad and its main tributaries, the Chari and Logone rivers. The actual rate of siltation and sedimentation of Lake Chad is unknown. However, it has been estimated that the lake could receive around 2.8 million tonnes of sediment by rivers each year, and approximately 150 tonnes of wind-generatedper km&sup2; of lake per year.Due to silting and sedimentation in the lake sedimentation in the lake, it has become difficult to navigate,especially during low-water periods.Other obstacles to navigation in Lake Chad include invasive plants. The 14th Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the LCBC,held in N'Djamena in April 2012, approved the following measures the following measures as a means of improving availability of water in the Chari River and Lake Chad:</p>
<p>i. Improve the hydraulic capacity of the Chari in order to limit losses in flood plains; </p>
<p>ii. Develop Lake Chad and its main tributaries through dredging and desilting to ensure a better distribution of water in the</p>
<p>the various basins of the lake.There is therefore a need for the intervention strategy should begin by acquiring knowledge,as well as the need for</p>
<p>observation and short-term measurements.</p>
<p> </p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
17,400,000.00
Operation Cost
0.00
Project Risk

<p>Not available </p>

Countries
Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon
Beneficiary Countries
Central African Republic, Chad, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon
Stakeholders
Lake Chad Basin Commission
Chad - Direction Generale des Routes
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Latitude
58.570000
Longitude
-41.003200
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Feasibility
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
ICT
Subsector Name
Fibre Optic Cable
Alternative Names
Extension of National ICT Broadband Backbone (NICTBB) to Mozambique by construction of optical fibre cable and point of presences (PoPs) for providing connectivity with Mozambique
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 2
On SDM
Off
Summary
<p>The main objective is to provide connectivity to Mozambique so that they can have access to sea cables of EASSy and SEACOM landed at Dar es salaam and also Tanzania will have access to sea cables landed in Mozambique and therefore will create resilience of international connectivity in SADC and EAC regions.</p>
Description

<p>Government of Tanzania constructed a National ICT Broadband Backbone (NICTBB) connecting all Regions in Tanzania and cross boarder connectivity to Zambia, Malawi, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. The NICTBB has a total length of 7,910Km. The aim of NICTBB is to connect all neighboring countries. Now the government is planning to connect Mozambique so that to enable access of submarine cables landed in both countries. This connect will increase the reliability of the sea cables in the SADC and EAC regions.</p>

Capex Cost
0.06USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
-2.00
Project Risk

<p>NA</p>

Countries
Tanzania, Mozambique, Tanzania, Mozambique, Tanzania, Rwanda, Malawi
Beneficiary Countries
Mozambique, Tanzania
REC
SADC
Stakeholders
African Union Development Agency
Southern African Development Community
Tanzania National ICT Broadband Backbone
Email
egetahun@outlook.com
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Updated Date
Latitude
-11.880000
Longitude
43.872200
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
PIDA Code
I.03.09
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Construction
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
ICT
Subsector Name
Internet Exchange Point
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 1
On SDM
Off
Summary
The IXP project is to keep in local internet communication local. It aims at building the technical capacity of the beneficiary country in managing Internet Exchange Point and to provide, when necessary, equipment needed for the establishment of the Internet exchange point.
Description

<p>The AXIS Project aims to facilitate the development of an African internet infrastructure through policy and regulatory reform, capacity building and technical assistance. Development of an African internet infrastructure refers to the establishment of regional internet exchange points (IXPs) and internet carriers.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project aims to facilitate the development of an African internet infrastructure through policy and regulatory reform, capacity building and technical assistance. Development of an African internet infrastructure refers to the establishment of regional internet exchange points (IXPs) and internet carriers.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project is being implemented through two phases. Phase I consists of capacity building to support the establishment of national IXPs through providing a series of two workshops for stakeholders and the Internet Service Provider Association (ISPA) on聽 I) best practice and benefits of IXP and II) technical assistance through workshops which will cover the technical and administrative skills needed to set up, operate, and administer an IXP.</p>

<p>Phase II focuses on supporting establishment of Regional IXP and Regional Internet Carrier through provisioning Capacity building workshops on best practice and benefits of setting up RIXP/IC and providing technical assistance.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project is a flagship project of the African Regional Action Plan on Knowledge Economy (ARAPKE) endorsed by the African Union Executive Council.聽</p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
0.00
Countries
Ethiopia, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
Beneficiary Countries
Ethiopia
REC
COMESA
Stakeholders
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
African Union Commission
Email
birazag@africa-union.org
Updated Date
Latitude
9.030000
Longitude
38.740000
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Project Definition
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Transport
Subsector Name
Multi-modal
Alternative Names
NOT AVAILABLE
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 2
On SDM
Off
Summary
<p>The project entails undertaking a feasibility study for the project, construction of a navigational line connecting Lake Victoria and the Mediterranean Sea through the Nile River, establishing river navigation management training centers in some of the footprint states based on the Egyptian experience, supporting economic development in the Nile Basin by raising the level of trade and transport of goods and people</p>
Description

VICMED Project is a multimodal transport project to link Lake Victoria and the Mediterranean Sea. The project aims to connect countries via an environmentally friendly, relatively low-cost transport route that is safe, secure, and energy efficient. It supports trade, tourism, and regional integration while providing access to international seas and boosting economic development. The project was launched by the Egyptian Government and NEPAD Agency in 2013. Phases include Pre-Feasibility, Feasibility Study 1 (2019), and upcoming Phase 2 studies.

Capex Cost
1,200.00USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
360.00
Countries
Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Rwanda, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda
REC
COMESA
Stakeholders
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
Nile Basin Initiative
African Union Development Agency
Start Date
Date Created Raw
Latitude
-0.760000
Longitude
33.443600
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Project Definition
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
Transport
Subsector Name
Inland Port & Waterway
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 2
On SDM
On
Summary
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Amasis MT Pro',serif;">The VICMED project is a strategic initiative aimed at establishing a navigational line connecting Lake Victoria to the Mediterranean Sea through the Nile River. This ambitious project, championed by Egypt and approved by the African Union in 2013, seeks to foster socio-economic integration, sustainable multimodal transport, and enhanced trade among the Nile Basin countries.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Amasis MT Pro',serif;">The project's objectives include poverty reduction, economic development, and improved global economic participation for the region. Key activities involve creating a safe, efficient waterway, building capacity for river navigation management, and promoting cross-border trade and tourism. The project emphasizes environmental balance, gender responsiveness, and inclusive development.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Amasis MT Pro',serif;">Organizationally, COMESA coordinates between the champion country (Egypt), the Project Management Unit, and other footprint countries. A Steering Committee with representatives from transport and water sectors oversees activities, while National Committees in each country represent stakeholders. The Regional Project Management Unit in Egypt manages operations and capacity building.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: 'Amasis MT Pro',serif;">The VICMED project is part of the PIDA Priority Action Plan 2 and aligns with various African development initiatives, including the AU's Agenda 2063 and AfDB's High-5 priorities. It supports climate change mitigation through low-carbon transport. The project has completed its prefeasibility study (funded by Egypt) and Phase 1 of the feasibility study (funded by AfDB), with Phase 2 currently in progress.</span></p>
Description

<p>Updating Content</p>

Capex Cost
3.06USD million
Preparation Cost
12.00
Operation Cost
167.50
Project Risk

<p>The main risks associated with the proposed studies relate to:</p>
<p>&bull; Delayed mobilization of financing for undertaking the Full Feasibility Study and Detailed Design and Implementation of the preferred alternative;</p>
<p>&bull; The limited funding made available for data collection could negatively affect the quality of the data taken into the next phase and therefore partially achieve the expected outcomes; and</p>
<p>&bull; There is a risk of delays in arrangements that entails an executing agency, could delay reviews and clearances of critical activities, such as procurement. &bull; These risks will be mitigated by the following:</p>
<p>&bull; The Bank Project Team and the Government of Egypt will work jointly to mitigate potential delays to ensure timely signature and ratification of the grant agreement;</p>
<p>&bull; The Bank through NEPAD IPPF will mobilize resources from partners to finance the next stage to Full Feasibility and Detail Design, Documentation to implementation;</p>
<p>&bull; A Steering Committee of Permanent/Principal Secretaries of the footprint states chaired by COMESA will be established to provide policy directions to the study. The scope of work in the TORs will be structured to ensure that quality data collected feeds into the next phase of the project. OMU will require close collaboration with OCUs with set timelines in which to complete reviews</p>

Countries
Egypt, Uganda, Sudan, South Sudan, Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia
Beneficiary Countries
Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia
Stakeholders
Egypt - Government of Egypt
Start Date
Date Created Raw
By Anonymous (not verified) , 24 February 2026
PIDA Code
I.03.08
Project Status
Active
Project Stage
Construction
Completion Percentage
0
Sector Name
ICT
Subsector Name
Internet Exchange Point
Reference Plan
PIDA PAP 1
On SDM
Off
Summary
The IXP project is to keep in local internet communication local. It aims at building the technical capacity of the beneficiary country in managing Internet Exchange Point and to provide, when necessary, equipment needed for the establishment of the Internet exchange point.
Description

<p>The AXIS Project aims to facilitate the development of an African internet infrastructure through policy and regulatory reform, capacity building and technical assistance. Development of an African internet infrastructure refers to the establishment of regional internet exchange points (IXPs) and internet carriers.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project aims to facilitate the development of an African internet infrastructure through policy and regulatory reform, capacity building and technical assistance. Development of an African internet infrastructure refers to the establishment of regional internet exchange points (IXPs) and internet carriers.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project is being implemented through two phases. Phase I consists of capacity building to support the establishment of national IXPs through providing a series of two workshops for stakeholders and the Internet Service Provider Association (ISPA) on聽 I) best practice and benefits of IXP and II) technical assistance through workshops which will cover the technical and administrative skills needed to set up, operate, and administer an IXP.</p>

<p>Phase II focuses on supporting establishment of Regional IXP and Regional Internet Carrier through provisioning Capacity building workshops on best practice and benefits of setting up RIXP/IC and providing technical assistance.</p>

<p>The AXIS Project is a flagship project of the African Regional Action Plan on Knowledge Economy (ARAPKE) endorsed by the African Union Executive Council.聽</p>

Capex Cost
0.00USD million
Preparation Cost
0.00
Operation Cost
0.00
Countries
Eritrea, Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Chad, C么te d'Ivoire, Eritrea
Beneficiary Countries
Eritrea, Zimbabwe
REC
COMESA
Stakeholders
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
Eritrea Communications Department
African Union Commission
African Development Bank
Email
ephrem.hailu@giz.de
Updated Date
Latitude
15.340000
Longitude
38.932700